The plaintiffs’ claim is based on nuisance. Negligence was not argued in final submissions. In support of their claim, the plaintiffs relied on Suzuki v. Munroe, 2009 BCSC 1403. In that case, the plaintiffs complained about significant disruption to their reasonable enjoyment due to the defendants’ noisy air conditioner. Based on professionally-obtained, objective evidence of excessive noise levels, the plaintiffs were successful. This case is easily distinguishable, since there was no objective evidence of excessive noise in this matter.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.