Is summary judgment appropriate in a personal injury action?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from I.K.K. v. M.P., 2018 ONSC 2473 (CanLII):

Summary judgment is appropriate where there is no genuine issue requiring a trial. This will be the case where the summary judgment process provides the court with the evidence required to fairly and justly adjudicate the dispute, by allowing the court to make the necessary findings of fact and to apply the law to the facts, and where summary judgment is a timely, affordable and proportionate procedure: see Hryniak v. Mauldin, 2014 SCC 7 (CanLII), at paras. 49-50, 66, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 87.

Other Questions


What is appropriate for summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion for summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for granting summary judgment in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a motion to add as parties to a personal injury action for personal injury costs granted? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the law of summary judgment including partial summary judgment? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a lawyer be personally liable for costs in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the deadlines for the release of reasons for judgment in a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining the appropriate venue for a personal injury action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a motion for summary judgment in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.