What is the standard of review of inferences in a summary conviction appeal?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Richardson, 2006 ABQB 828 (CanLII):
On a summary conviction appeal, the appropriate standard of review on issues of law is correctness. On issues of fact, including inferences, an appeal court can intervene only if the trial judge made a palpable and overriding error: Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 2002 SCC 33.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the standard of review from a summary conviction appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review on a summary conviction appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the relevant case law on summary conviction and summary conviction? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review under appeal law and what is the scope of review? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review in the context of standard review on mixed fact and law? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a waiver be signed to allow a summary conviction court to transfer information between two summary conviction courts? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the appropriate standard of review for the purpose of determining whether a claim has been successful at the Court of Appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the reviewing judge in an administrative law case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion to appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the standard of review for an appellate court reviewing a trial decision? (Alberta, Canada)
