To have an order reconsidered pursuant to subrule (3), the applicant “bears the onus of establishing that the failure to appear was not blameworthy”. The applicant must satisfy three conditions. First, that he or she is not guilty of wilful delay or default. Second, that he or she has brought the application for reconsideration as soon as reasonably possible. And third, that he or she has shown a meritorious defence or at least a defence worthy of investigation: Rangi v. Rangi, 2007 BCCA 352 [Rangi] at para. 73.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.