Is it a motorman's duty to look and see if it is safe to cross?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from O’Connor v. Mahabir, 1999 ABQB 326 (CanLII):

Similarly, in Weston v. City of Saskatoon 1940 CanLII 126 (SK QB), [1941] 3 W.W.R. 293 the head-note reads: When a pedestrian is crossing a street railway track it is his duty to look and see whether it is safe to cross. Failure to do so constitutes negligence. A street railway motormen is justified in assuming that a pedestrian approaching the street railway track would use ordinary prudence and would not attempt to cross when there is danger in doing so. If however, it becomes apparent that the pedestrian intends to cross regardless of the danger it is the motorman’s duty to act promptly to avert the danger.

Other Questions


Can a court order production of a plaintiff’s passport to be cross-examined on an affidavit? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any chance that this cross-action and appeal will succeed? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for accepting as true the evidence of a witness who has not been cross-examined? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for invoking the principle of cross-examination? (Alberta, Canada)
When will separate counsel be allowed to cross-examine a co-defendant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for cross-examination in a sexual assault case involving a pornographic film? (Alberta, Canada)
Is cross-examination permissible in a civil proceeding? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a cross-examination be evenly balanced between the parties? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for cross-examination in a child abuse case? (Alberta, Canada)
Is cross estoppel consistent with merger? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.