Is it a motorman's duty to look and see if it is safe to cross?

Alberta, Canada

The following excerpt is from O’Connor v. Mahabir, 1999 ABQB 326 (CanLII):

Similarly, in Weston v. City of Saskatoon 1940 CanLII 126 (SK QB), [1941] 3 W.W.R. 293 the head-note reads: When a pedestrian is crossing a street railway track it is his duty to look and see whether it is safe to cross. Failure to do so constitutes negligence. A street railway motormen is justified in assuming that a pedestrian approaching the street railway track would use ordinary prudence and would not attempt to cross when there is danger in doing so. If however, it becomes apparent that the pedestrian intends to cross regardless of the danger it is the motorman’s duty to act promptly to avert the danger.

Other Questions

When will a cross-examination be allowed in relation to an informer’s activities in unrelated police investigations? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of the husband’s cross-motion argument in a family law case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law in which a head-note is used to justify a respondent's decision not to file a cross petition? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a party's failure to cross-examine a witness on their affidavit admissible at trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the testator’s cross-applying for solicitor and client costs in a Notice of Objection to Probate? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a defendant cross-examine his co-defendant’s evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for interfering with a trial judge's findings and conclusions on a cross-appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the scope of an expert’s cross-examination at a personal injury trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) position on cross-examinations? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the status of B.B.C.’s cross-appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)