The decision to admit a late-served expert report involves an exercise of discretion. As such, the decision is owed deference on appeal. In Stone v. Ellerman, 2009 BCCA 294, 93 B.C.L.R. (4th) 203, leave to appeal ref’d [2009] S.C.C.A. No. 364, Chief Justice Finch summarized the applicable standard of review as follows:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.