What is the test for awarding non-pecuniary damages in a personal injury case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from McKenzie v. Lloyd, 2016 BCSC 1745 (CanLII):
In Stapley v. Hejslet, 2006 BCCA 34, leave to appeal ref’d [2006] SCCA No. 100, at para. 46, Madam Justice Kirkpatrick outlined that the following factors are to be considered in awarding non-pecuniary damages:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award in a personal injury case where damages are awarded on the basis that it is inordinately high or inordinately low? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for challenging an award for damages awarded by a jury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining the quantum of damages awarded by a judge in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors should be considered in determining the amount of damages awarded by the Court in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an error of principle in awarding damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
