Can a wife argue that spousal support based upon an interim order can be reviewed and revised retroactively at trial?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Ross v. Ross, 2013 BCSC 1716 (CanLII):

The wife argues that spousal support based upon an interim order can be reviewed and revised retroactively at trial: Tedham v. Tedham, 2003 BCCA 600, at paras. 55-72 (dealing with retroactive child support), and Tedham v. Tedham 2005 BCCA 502, at para. 83, “The same argument could have been made with respect to spousal support.” She argues that the same principle applies when dealing with spousal support at trial based upon a separation agreement which sets interim support.

Other Questions


Does the consent order of 1981 consent order on spousal support issue order apply to a nominal support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a spousal support order is varied as a result of a change in circumstances and a review of the support order? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a spouse's failure to make an interim application for retroactive child and spousal support carry more weight than they would have if they were seeking interim support? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Justice order a further review order to order that an expert in economic forecasting of the economic circumstances of a separated spouse be reviewed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is retroactive child support relevant to a retroactive spousal support claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a final spousal support order under section 15.2(3) of the Attorney General's Guidelines for Divorce Review Order enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a spouse to apply for spousal support under the Spousal Support Review System? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable to an order of spousal support? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court order retroactive child support for a retroactive period of 12 years? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the submission of the Respondent on an interim order to order a primary parent to continue as the primary parent of the child pending trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.