What is the test for awarding special costs in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Watson v. Seacastle Enterprises Inc., 2007 BCSC 365 (CanLII):

The test for the awarding of special costs is whether or not a party’s conduct is worthy of rebuke. An attempt to contaminate evidence is conduct worthy of rebuke (see Coulter v. Ball, 2003 BCSC 1186 at paras. 23 and 88). The evidence does not support the plaintiff’s contention that the defendant engaged in the reprehensible conduct of influencing the testimony of a witness. There will be no special costs. Decision

Other Questions


If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, has the court ever awarded special costs for non-disclosure of documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an award of special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances can a party be awarded special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard for awarding special costs in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the court have to award costs to the successful party in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have special costs been awarded in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have special costs been awarded in civil actions where the purpose of the civil action was to silence public opposition? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for awarding costs to the successful party in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.