Does solicitor privilege attach to communications that were in preparation or in furtherance of a crime or fraud?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Popoff v. Popoff, 2000 SKQB 151 (CanLII):

Where there is a prima facie case that the communications between the solicitor and client were made in preparation for or in furtherance of a crime or fraud (civil or criminal), regardless of whether the solicitor is aware of such purpose, privilege does not attach. The fraud does not necessarily have to be criminal in nature, but it must be more than something like a breach of contract. This is true regardless of whether the solicitor is acting in good faith. See Descoteaux v. Mierzwinski, supra, at page 404.

Other Questions


Can confidential communications between solicitor and client be privileged? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the privilege afforded to private communications between a detained person and his solicitor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does solicitor/client privilege protect documents prepared in contemplation of litigation? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a solicitor be found guilty of fraud if he discovers that a mortgage is not perfected by registration? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What privilege exists to communications to counsel from the client's agent? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a garnishee order attached to a tenant's rent be attached as a debt owing or accruing due? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does solicitor-client privilege apply to invoices of lawyers? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is a fundamental right to private communication with a solicitor? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for dismissing an appeal against a finding that a solicitor acted as a solicitor in relation to the sale of a property in 1940? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is a privileged occasion and what is the effect on privileged occasions? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.