What is the test for a flexible approach to causation in medical negligence cases?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Shumka v. Holloway, 2002 CanLII 22373 (ON SC):

Snell v. Farrell (1991) 1990 CanLII 70 (SCC), 72 D.L.R. (4th) 289 S.C.C., is the leading case on the issue of causation, and is used as the hallmark for a flexible approach to causation in medical negligence cases. Mr. Justice Sopinka promoted the use of a robust and pragmatic approach to the facts of the case to enable an inference to be drawn even if the conclusion could not be reached on the basis of medical expertise. He stated: It is not speculation but the application of common sense to draw such an inference where the circumstances other than a positive medical opinion permit.

Other Questions


What is the case law on medical malpractice in the context of medical negligence cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law on medical malpractice in the context of medical negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for negligent negligence in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for negligent negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the elements of negligence and causation in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
How is causation determined in medical negligence cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a standard medical practice negligent in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law that allows a plaintiff to plead both an intentional tort of negligence and an unintentional tort of intentional negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on disclosure of medical records in medical malpractice cases? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the but for test apply in establishing a material contribution to risk approach in a tort of negligence case? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.