For example, in Smith v. Smith, 2008 BCCA 245, the husband had transferred his beneficial interest in a rental property to a corporation, of which he held 100% of the shares. Madam Justice Newbury determined that the rental property had been ordinarily used for a family purpose, but in applying the definition in s. 58(3)(a), held the shares to be family assets.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.