What is the standard of evidence required to establish an exclusion under the Rules of Civil Procedure?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Higgs v Lear, 2020 BCSC 194 (CanLII):

In Shih v. Shih, 2017 BCCA 37, the court commented on the need for “clear and cogent” evidence to establish the exclusion, particularly if documentation is not available:

Other Questions


What is the impact of Rule 37B of the BC Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on Rule 37 B of the Rules of Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevance of Rule 11‑6(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure requiring a physical examination? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the BCSC need to approve the proposed amendments to the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure to the rules of procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge in a fast-track action depart from the fixed amount under Rule 15-1(15) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a chambers judge proceed under Rule 18A of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a summary trial where there is a conflict in the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 37B of the Canadian Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure on the duration and expense of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure require a plaintiff to accept an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for proportionality under Rule 1-3(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure and Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of Rule 30 of the Rule 40A of the Rules of Civil Procedure on an application for a medical examination that comes three weeks before trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with motions under Rule 34 and Rule 19(24)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.