Discrimination and the Law, referring to Zarankin v. Johnstone (1984), 5 C.H.R.R. D 2274 (B.C.Bc. Inq.) at D/2280, sets out the standard of proof in sexual harassment cases: The Complainant must prove, on a balance of probabilities that there was a contravention...of the Human Rights Code. This involves two parts: (1) proof that the alleged conduct by the Respondent occurred; [and] (2) proof that it constituted sexual harassment in the circumstances (for example, that it took place without the complainant's willing consent). If the Complainant leads evidence which could satisfy these requirements, then the Respondent has an evidentiary burden to respond with some evidence that the acts did not occur or that they did not constitute sexual harassment. (at p. 15-57)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.