Can the very nature of sexual harassment be sufficient to establish that the sex of the applicant was a factor in the adverse treatment?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Anderson v. Law Help Ltd., 2016 HRTO 1683 (CanLII):

With respect to the fourth part of the test, the very nature of the sexual harassment can be sufficient to establish that the sex of the applicant was a factor in the adverse treatment. See Friedmann v. MacGarvie, 2012 BCCA 445 at paras. 31-32.

Other Questions


Is there any case law relating to an accident benefit application where a delay in submitting the Application due to a personal relationship preventing the Applicant from making an application? (Ontario, Canada)
What constitutes sexual harassment and sexual advance? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with an application where the applicant's disrespectful behaviour was so extreme that the application was dismissed as abuse of process? (Ontario, Canada)
How have the HRTO treated allegations of sexual harassment in an application? (Ontario, Canada)
On the ground of urgency, in what circumstances will the applicant continue with her application for leave to continue with the application? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances have the LSUC suspended a member for sexually harassing a client? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the case law in favour of adducing additional evidence at the application stage of the application? (Ontario, Canada)
When a defendant's mistaken belief that a fire department vehicle was approaching his vehicle from the rear, westbound lane of the Derry Road, is sufficient to establish due diligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary onus on the applicant to admit a child to a secure treatment centre? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that the delay in making a divorce application was incurred in good faith? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.