In balancing the injustices that may arise from the imposition of a security for costs order, I have noted above that I am not satisfied that such an order would stifle a valid claim. On the other hand the defendant, a resident of Alberta, is faced with considerable expense in defending a case whose outcome is by no means certain. I note the statement of Finch J.A. (as he then was)at ¶11 of Kropp v. Swaneset: The law does not treat corporate plaintiffs with the same generosity and flexibility as natural persons opposing an application for security.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.