Does Rule 56.01(1) create a prima facie right to security for costs?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Kerlow v. Corrigan, 2019 ONSC 5181 (CanLII):

Rule 56.01(1) does not create a prima facie right to security for costs but rather triggers an enquiry whereby the court, using its broad discretion, considers multiple factors to make such order as is just in the circumstances. These factors include the merits of the claim, the financial circumstances of the plaintiff and the possibility of an order for security for costs preventing a bona fide claim from proceeding (Stojanovic v. Bulut, 2011 ONSC 874 (CanLII) at paras. 4-5).

Other Questions


How have the Steepers obtained the right to park their parking on the right of a right of way on a neighbour's property? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a joint owner of a property a prima facie right to have the property sold? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a prima facie case of discrimination in a human rights complaint? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to pay the costs of preparing a Bill of Costs and costs submission in a personal injury case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a parent has the prima facie right to move a child from one parent to the other parent's custody? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a joint tenant have a prima facie right to an order for the sale or partition of lands held with another joint tenant? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a joint tenant have a prima facie right to sale prior to trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a prima facie case of discrimination in a human rights case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the scope of a right of way that was created by an express grant to a servient tenement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for security for costs in a custody and access matter? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.