[26] Section 8 is shrewdly vague. Facially, it is not identifiable as a protection of privacy; but this has been its effect since Hunter v. Southam Inc. (1984), 1984 CanLII 33 (SCC), 14 C.C.C. (3d) 97 (S.C.C.). In that historic decision, the court arrived at these conclusions regarding section 8: (a) section 8 offers a broad protection against unreasonable search and seizure; (b) section 8 is engaged where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy; (c) a warrantless search is presumptively unreasonable; and (d) to avoid infringing section 8, any interference with a reasonable expectation of privacy either must be pursuant to a warrant or must fall within some exceptional circumstance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.