In Righter v. Righter, an unreported case, the court was asked to terminate the appointment of Section 3 Counsel because subsequent to the appointment, the allegedly incapable person had been determined to in fact be incapable. The argument advanced was that section 3 is no longer applicable because capacity was not “in issue”. Aston J. noted that, notwithstanding the assessment of incapacity, s. 3 deemed the person capable of instructing her lawyer, which she did in that case. Despite being incapable, the court found that Section 3 Counsel still had a role to play – testing the jurisdiction of the court, authority to make orders, and making submissions on the evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.