Can an actuarial surplus in the Trust Fund be realized in violation of the terms of the Plan?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lomas v. Rio Algom Limited, 2010 ONCA 175 (CanLII):

It is an error to infer that the rule in Saunders v. Vautier can create a manner of realizing on the actuarial surplus in the fund in violation of the terms of the Plan. In this Plan, absolute entitlement to the surplus would only occur once the surplus became real, that is, once the Plan and Trust had been terminated. This is because the members only have a contingent interest in the Trust surplus which does not vest until the Plan is terminated. [See Note 19 below]

Other Questions


Is a member of a pension plan entitled to distribution of surplus funds from a partial termination of the pension plan? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a variation in terms of an order that would have changed the terms of a long-term disability order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for terminating a trust where the sole beneficiary of the trust is not entitled to terminate the trust? (Ontario, Canada)
Does s. 43(2) of the Rules of Civil Procedure apply to a trust in a trust? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for determining the equivalence of terms between an offer and the terms of an order? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the remedy of constructive trust available to a plaintiff in a constructive trust action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a resulting or constructive trust not a constructive trust? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Retirement Pension Fund Trust Rule from Saunders v. Vautier apply to an employee pension plan? (Ontario, Canada)
In support of a joint family plan, does the Child and Family Services Act, R.O. 1990, c.61(2) make a presumption in favour of a community or kin plan? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a by-law violation or zoning violation go to the root of title? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.