Can the common law rule in Saunders v. Vautier be employed to terminate the pension trust?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Lomas v. Rio Algom Limited, 2008 CanLII 2596 (ON SCDC):

In Buschau, the members of the defined benefit pension plan maintained that the rule in Saunders v. Vautier could be employed to terminate the pension trust and argued, in the alternative, that Rogers should terminate the plan pursuant to its fiduciary duty under the Pension Benefits Standards Act, 1985, R.S.C. 1985, c. 32 (2nd Supp.) ("PBSA"). The common law rule in Saunders v. Vautier was summarized by Deschamps J., at para. 21, as "allowing beneficiaries of a trust to depart from the settlor's original intentions provided that they are of full legal capacity and are together entitled to all the rights of beneficial ownership in the trust property".

In Buschau, Deschamps J. for the majority described defined benefit plans and discussed the question of surplus concluding, consistent with established jurisprudence, that while a defined benefit pension plan is in operation, individuals entitled to the surplus assets do not have a specific interest in them. The right to surplus is crystallized only when the surplus becomes ascertainable upon termination of the plan. See Schmidt v. Air Products Canada Ltd., 1994 CanLII 104 (SCC), [1994] 2 S.C.R. 611, [1994] S.C.J. No. 48.

Other Questions


What is the test for terminating a trust where the sole beneficiary of the trust is not entitled to terminate the trust? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Retirement Pension Fund Trust Rule from Saunders v. Vautier apply to an employee pension plan? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the common law rule in Saunders v Vautier apply to pension plans? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the duty of an employer to seek alternate employment for employees who have lost their employment due to the loss of their employment? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a member of a pension plan entitled to distribution of surplus funds from a partial termination of the pension plan? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the best interest of pension plan members to receive their pro rata share of a partial wind-up on partial termination of an employee pension plan? (Ontario, Canada)
Does an indefinite term employment contract require the employer to give reasonable notice of an intention to terminate the contract? (Ontario, Canada)
Is an applicant entitled to compensation for loss of employment due to the employer’s failure to mitigate her loss by making reasonable efforts to obtain suitable employment? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the trust rule in Saunders v. Vautier allow employees to circumvent statutory procedure and defeat the objective of the legislative scheme? (Ontario, Canada)
How have courts dealt with an application seeking to force an employer to make payments into a pension fund for the benefit of certain pension members? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.