Is it possible for a motion under Rule 50.13 (6)(d) to be made summarily at a case conference without convening a formal hearing?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Innocon Inc. v. Daro Flooring Constructions Inc., 2021 ONSC 7558 (CanLII):
Rule 50.13 (6)(d) therefore anticipates orders being made summarily at case conferences without convening a formal hearing or undertaking the expensive procedural accoutrements of a motion under Rule 37. See: Hemmings v. Peng, 2019 ONSC 1937, at para. 28 and Chatham Street Realco (2102) Inc. v. Lalor et al., 2020 ONSC 5698.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is it possible for a motion to be heard on a long motion in a single day? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for elevated costs of a motion for a motion to amend a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a motion of no confidence in a motion to amend the terms of a motion? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the court considered a motion for leave to appeal a decision of the case conference judge staying a motion to change until outstanding costs have been paid? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the result of a motion to redact reference to settlement conference materials from the applicant's motion? (Ontario, Canada)
On an interim motion, is it more likely that the court will grant a motion to allow the motion to be heard before trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for requiring disclosure on a motion without notice? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party who brings the motion as well as the witnesses upon whom the moving/applying party relies have an obligation to present and present witnesses to the motion? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a motion being brought before the House of Commons on a motion of no confidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a motion judge's decision not to bifurcate the liability and penalty phases of a contempt motion? (Ontario, Canada)
