Does Rule 37(31) bar joint defendants from making joint offers to settle?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Marszalek v. Bishop, 2008 BCSC 370 (CanLII):
The defendants submit that in these circumstances, they are not prohibited from making a valid joint offer to settle under Rule 37. They distinguish decisions at both trial and appellate levels, which have cited Brown v. Lowe as authority for the proposition that non-joint defendants may not make joint offers to settle. They say that Rule 37(31) is a restriction on the application of Rule 37(2), in that it only requires defendants who are sued jointly to make a joint offer. It does not prohibit multiple defendants in an action from making a joint offer to settle, provided that the offer is clear and unambiguous, particularly where some of the defendants are joint tortfeasors and all of the defendants are tortfeasors whose independent acts combined to produce the same damage. They submit that their joint offer is valid under Rule 37(2).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can multiple defendants in a single action make individual offers to settle under Rule 37? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant make a single post-offer damages offer under Rule 37B of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for making a settlement offer to multiple defendants? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to double costs under Rule 37 of the Rules of Civil Procedure if it makes a single offer to settle two separate actions? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an offer that does not comply with Rule 37 B constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a defendant have to pay special costs if a plaintiff has made an offer to settle their claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defendant in a separate action with the same plaintiff receive costs from 7 days after making a joint payment into court of a similar amount? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper remedy in a common law common law relationship where the parties acquired a joint home as joint ownership of Crowe Road jointly owned by the parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an initial and comprehensive settlement offer made by the respondent and a revised offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a defendant entitled to a 65% share of the joint net worth as a result of his disproportionate contribution to the parties jointly net worth? (British Columbia, Canada)
