Is it premature to proceed with a Rule 18A application if discovery of documents is not complete?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from EVO Properties Ltd. v. 637934 B.C. Ltd.,, 2004 BCSC 1203 (CanLII):

In Phillips Paul v. Malak Holdings Ltd., [2002] B.C.J. No. 1869, 2002 BCSC 1191, Burnyeat J. held that it may be premature to proceed with a Rule 18A application where discovery of documents is not complete.

Other Questions


Is a failure to complete document discovery an excuse for failing to attend an examination for discovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party decline to attend for discovery if there has not been complete discovery of documents by both parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law in England and Wales on discovery by interrogatories and discovery of documents? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application for an extension of time for a review of an application under the Access to Proceeds of Justice Act, BCSC 2220? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a class proceeding be the basis for a legal proceeding if the claims presented in that proceeding cannot be sustained individually? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Owner of a Strata Plan need to provide documentation in order to proceed with the application? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the principles applicable to interim applications for approval in a class proceeding? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can an application to dismiss on an interlocutory application be dismissed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have a duty to hear an application where the adjudicator of the application has been found in error? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court order that a party provide an affidavit verifying its list of documents when in the absence of any adequate explanation, relevant documents have been omitted from the list? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.