Can a properly certified ROC be adduced at trial?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from United States of America v. Trotter, 2013 BCSC 1764 (CanLII):

Ferras, at para. 58, also provides that evidence summarized in a properly certified ROC is presumptively available to the requesting state for trial. However, the person sought can seek to call evidence to challenge the presumption. In United States of America v. Thornett, 2013 BCSC 1470 at para. 34, the court addressed the availability of a ROC witness to give evidence and held that asserting availability at this stage means no more than the prosecution representing that the ROC evidence is capable of being adduced.

Other Questions


In what circumstances will the trial judge rule that a gun found by the police can be adduced in evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have the parties considered that the trial judge’s reasons of 27 September 2002 constitute a judgment for which an order can properly be drawn and entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a reasonable time for an offer to be made at trial if an offer is not made within a specific time from the start of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an application to re-open a trial to establish a fact not in existence at the close of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the value of a plaintiff's income for the period between the time of trial and the date of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reducing the length of a trial to a truncated trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test on an application to adduce fresh evidence that existed at the time of trial but was not placed before the trial court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the balance of convenience between the date of trial and the location of the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the adjudicator adjudicated that a jurat has not been completed properly, and that a report was not properly sworn as a result of the Commissioner writing his name on the wrong line? (British Columbia, Canada)

There are no other similar questions at this time.