Does the Restrictive Covenant constitute a building scheme and is valid?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Barker v. Palmer, 2005 ABQB 815 (CanLII):

As all of the requirements set out in Elliston v. Reacher are met, the Restrictive Covenant constitutes a building scheme and is valid. Section 48(4) of the Land Titles Act

Other Questions


Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for breaching a restrictive covenant in a condominium scheme? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a restrictive covenant be valid at equity? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a valid building scheme? (Alberta, Canada)
When a business is sold and the former owners of the business are restricted from competing directly with the new business, can the new owners enforce restrictive covenants? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a caveat in issue sufficient to constitute a building scheme? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a general advertisement sufficient to constitute a breach of a non-solicitation covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for service in a restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
How have restrictive covenants been interpreted in the context of real estate law? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a covenant to maintain an open, unassuming garden "in an open state, uncovered with any buildings"? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.