Is it appropriate for the applicant to reopen his case to allow evidence to be called to justify the reception of the notes as proof?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Mathis Estate, Re;Piasta v. St. John's Cathedral Boys School et al., 1988 CanLII 7215 (MB QB):

The applicant has requested that he be allowed to reopen his case to allow the appropriate evidence to be called to justify the reception of the notes as proof pursuant to Ares v. Venner (supra). It is contended there was a misunderstanding as to the effect of allowing the notes to be filed pursuant to s. 49. The reason for the notes being allowed into evidence was clearly stated at the time of filing and it would not be appropriate to reopen the case at this time

Other Questions


When will an application be dismissed because the applicant failed to disclose sufficient particulars about her financial situation? (Manitoba, Canada)
If a court accepts the records of a testatrix as proof of her mental state, is there any evidence that she was in a state of distress? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will an application be allowed to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the effect of lay opinion evidence on a summary judgment motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for oral evidence in a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for an application for partition or sale? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to discharge the onus of a gift? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for evidence of fraud in an insurance claim? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can an applicant argue that an arbitrator or tribunal has not explicitly considered every argument or issue raised by the parties? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does a judge have discretion to depart from the applicable tariff on an award of costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.