What relevant contingencies need to be considered in determining the outcome of a medical malpractice case?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from McConvey v. Hart, 2013 BCSC 1058 (CanLII):

In terms of relevant contingencies that need to be considered, they may be general or specific in nature. Relevant contingencies can include such things as the potential for improvements in health, opportunities for advancement, decline in the economy and loss of employment, as well as the usual chances and hazards of life: Djukic v. Hahn, 2006 BCSC 154, at para. 105; Kuskis at para. 155.

Other Questions


Does the entire agreement clause in a medical malpractice case apply to all medical malpractices? (British Columbia, Canada)
When considering a patient's medical history, is it possible for the medical malpractice review to consider a single file? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether the evidence in a medical malpractice case supports the case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the factors used in determining the outcome of a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant case law and case law relevant to this determination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the case law on the validity of evidence in a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care of the medical staff in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is considered a "delicate balance of factors" in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of disclosure required by the Canadian Medical Association in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has consent or court approval been considered in the context of medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.