Can an equal contribution after separation be a relevant consideration in reapportioning of seats?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Muraca v Dunsmore, 2022 BCSC 279 (CanLII):

Unequal contribution after separation can be a relevant consideration in reapportionment: Jaszczewska v. Kostanski, 2016 BCCA 286, at paras. 51-52.

Other Questions


How have the courts in BC dealt with the issue of separation in the context of separation and separation? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does each party have an equal share of the value of a property if they contribute equal amounts to the down payment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who contributed more than his or her proportionate contribution to a joint account that was set aside for the purposes of calculating the difference between their contributions to the joint account? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the court consider relevancy of the relevant questions in a case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the basis for a finding that a judge gave insufficient weight to relevant considerations? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the spousal contribution under s. 65 of the BC S. 65(1) of the Spousal Contribution Guidelines? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of a 1972 matrimonial home agreement on the equalization of equal shares? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the date of separation in a personal injury action have to be determined by the date in which both parties' pleadings state that they separated on April 15, 2013? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases where a court has considered a party’s contributions to the calculation of the parties’ respective financial contributions in dividing the proceeds of sale? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are separate injuries that can be separated out and attributed to the constituent causes? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.