In Moore v. Moore, [1988] B.C.J. No. 740 at para. 5, Huddart J. held the following guidelines should be used in determining whether a particular debt should be considered in the reapportionment of assets: 5. … (a) the extent to which each spouse has benefited from the incurring of the debt or from the dilatory payment of it, before or after separation; (b) the intention of the spouses when the debt was incurred as to who would be responsible; (c) whether the debt was incurred before or after separation; (d) with regard to income tax liability, the date of receipt of the income by reason of which the liability has been incurred. (Citations omitted)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.