In her supplemental written submissions, the Client submits that I should not consider the registrar’s supplemental reasons. She suggests that the registrar, having declined to reopen her comments as to how she reached her decision, should not be considered on this appeal. She refers to Scarr v. Gower (1956), 1956 CanLII 276 (BC CA), 2 D.L.R. (2d) 402, 18 W.W.R. 184 (B.C.C.A.) as authority for the proposition that reasons given by a judge after a notice of appeal should not be considered.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.