Does a learned trial justice erred by misapprehending the key issue of identification?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Grady, 2007 CanLII 22658 (ON SC):
However in applying Regina v. W.(D)., this court finds that the learned trial Justice erred by: a) Misapprehending the evidence on the key issue of identification; b) Misapplying the law of corroboration to support his findings of identification.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are some examples of civil cases involving Minister of Justice (Minister of Justice) Minister for Justice? (Ontario, Canada)
Can punitive damages be certified as a common issue for the first common issues trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the term issue "issue" in the context of the issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What role does the Minister of Justice (“Minister of Justice) in dealing with the issue of extradition? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the argument that a judge should consider some of the issues before the trial of the others? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for success and entitlement at trial on the issue of primary residence and parenting time? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the evidentiary burden of proving there is no genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining a genuine issue for trial? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the effect of the learned Chancellor’s sacking of the Supreme Court of Justice? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there any genuine issue requiring a trial? (Ontario, Canada)
