How has the accused obtained copies of statements of witnesses from the police?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Anderson, 2000 BCPC 159 (CanLII):

The accused has copies of statements of these witnesses. These were obtained from the Crown. Again, an example of the effectiveness of Regina v. Stinchcombe. Therefore, the accused knows what the witnesses told the police and he could ask them what they know when he places them on the witness stand before me. That evidence would be relevant on the evidence of sufficiency.

Other Questions


Does the fact that the accused was given a warning or obtained legal advice between the two statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a police officer have a duty on the accused to advise the accused of a criminal offence of not seeking counsel for a second time when new circumstances arise indicating that the accused is a suspect for a different crime than was the first warning? (British Columbia, Canada)
Are statements or utterances admissible to show the state of mind of the accused at the time the statements were made? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it improper for a police officer to delay making a call to legal counsel while the accused is being questioned at a police station? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an unidentified police informer acting as an agent of the police when she entered the premises of two accused? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a uniformed police officer who was not actively participating in the investigation compel the accused to speak to the accused's lawyer? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What are the implications of a police interview where the accused was questioned before the accused had a chance to telephone his lawyer? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can the police enter an apartment under warrant to search and arrest an accused? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the tests used by the police and the courts to determine whether an accused was impaired by alcohol to the degree of impairing his ability to drive? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is perjury committed in the course of both police statements taken under oath and at a preliminary hearing sufficient to qualify as an exceptional case? (Ontario, Canada)