Is a trial judge required to consider the reason for the delay in dealing with the first step in the two-segment test?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Lind, 2007 BCPC 196 (CanLII):

I have some difficulty in deciphering from Regina v. Morin, which I have reviewed several times, whether a trial judge in dealing with the first step in the two-segment test is to consider the reason for the delay in light of the above finding of Sopinka J. on the facts of Morin and his express statement that this inquiry “reasons for the delay” follows a finding on the length of delay.

Other Questions


In an appeal from an acquittal, can the reasonableness of the trial judge’s reasons be considered to be inadequate? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are sufficient reasons are required for a trial judge to leave a defendant with no reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have the parties considered that the trial judge’s reasons of 27 September 2002 constitute a judgment for which an order can properly be drawn and entered? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the error of a learned trial judge in failing to consider whether there was an unexpected and not reasonably foreseeable presence of black ice? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a trial judge to consider the relationship between biological parents and their respective support networks? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a court of appeal to alter an award made by a judge at trial for delayed payment of damages to a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a trial judge when dealing with a loss of earning capacity claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant time frame for calculating a delay under s. 11(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada for the purpose of computing a reasonable trial within a reasonable time? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will the Court consider in deciding whether it would be unjust to find that a summary trial is appropriate to consider the issues before deciding whether to proceed with a conventional trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.