Can a reviewing judge interfere with a warrant and Information to Obtain de novo?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Q.M.P. Fisheries Ltd., 2001 BCPC 210 (CanLII):

A reviewing judge should not review the warrant and Information to Obtain de novo and should not substitute its view for that of the authorizing justice. If, based on the record, which was before the authorizing justice as amplified on review, the reviewing judge concludes the authorizing justice could have granted the warrant, then he or she should not interfere. Regina v. Araujo, [2000] S.C.C. 992, Regina v. Garafoli, (1990), 1990 CanLII 52 (SCC), 60 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (S.C.C.) The question is whether there was some reliable evidence that might reasonably be believed on the basis of which the warrant could have issued. Regina v. Araujo, supra.

Other Questions


Does a judicial review decision by a chambers judge who failed to take the necessary steps to review a decision by the chambers judge? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a search warrant obtained by the Justice in the Information to Obtain pursuant to Section 8 of the Charter valid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a subsequent declaration of invalid warrant result in the exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of the execution of a search warrant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a judge interfere with a trial judge's findings of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the standards of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision made under the Rules of Review Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to prove that they have obtained sufficient information to obtain the requisite identification? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for obtaining a search warrant from a court in Canada for the purpose of obtaining assistance from a foreign state? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a husband obtain an injunction preventing his ex-wife from disclosing confidential information obtained during their marriage? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by an appellate court reviewing a decision of a trial judge concerning matters of custody and access? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts interpreted Bolster Review Review Review for mixed fact and law? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.