A reviewing judge should not review the warrant and Information to Obtain de novo and should not substitute its view for that of the authorizing justice. If, based on the record, which was before the authorizing justice as amplified on review, the reviewing judge concludes the authorizing justice could have granted the warrant, then he or she should not interfere. Regina v. Araujo, [2000] S.C.C. 992, Regina v. Garafoli, (1990), 1990 CanLII 52 (SCC), 60 C.C.C. (3d) 161 (S.C.C.) The question is whether there was some reliable evidence that might reasonably be believed on the basis of which the warrant could have issued. Regina v. Araujo, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.