In Honey v. Coquitlam School District No. 43, [1999] B.C.H.R.T.D. No. 18 (Q.L.), I determined that: … a complainant may prove a violation of section 43 of the Code either by demonstrating that the respondent intended to engage in conduct described in that section, or that the respondent can be reasonably perceived as having intended to engage in such conduct. (at para. 22) Refusal to Meet
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.