The defendants now say that the Reports identify issues or conditions they were unaware of and which require that they obtain responsive expert evidence. The obvious question which arises as a result of the timing issues that I have alluded to, is whether what the defendants seek is "truly responsive rebuttal evidence", per Williamson J. in Kelley v. Kelley (1995), 20 B.C.L.R. (3d) 232 at para. 13 (S.C.).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.