What are the consequences if a party takes a "no action" approach to litigation?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from The Corporation of the Municipality of Meaford v. Grist, 2012 ONSC 108 (CanLII):

However, parties who adopt such an approach to litigation cannot reasonably expect that, even when they are successful, the greater costs arising from this approach will always be borne by the unsuccessful party: Real Group v. Core Precision, [2011] O.J. No. 4454.

Other Questions


Is a family law litigant responsible for the actions they take in the litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for laches in an action brought by a party who has been a party to an action for over a year? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a party to a personal injury action be regarded as a "voluntary" party to the action? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a family law litigant responsible for the positions they take in the litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
If a successful party accepts an offer to settle, can the successful party be ordered to pay all or part of the unsuccessful party’s costs? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a party have to retain the services of a litigation expert for the purpose of the purposes of the litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a litigation guardian required to approve a partial settlement that includes payment of 15% plus party and party costs to solicitors? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a crown attorney acting for the applicant in a litigation between parties not providing a service to the opposing party? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the consequence of a party not filing material or taking steps to cross-examine on an affidavit? (Ontario, Canada)
If the parties cannot agree on the issue of costs in a personal injury action, can the parties make written submissions to the Respondent to the Application to the Court of Appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.