What is a good defence to a malicious arrest claim?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Schaal v. Reeves, 1918 CanLII 257 (SK QB):

In Ravenga v. Mackintosh, 4 D. & R. 107; 2 B. & C. 693; 1 Car. & P. 204; 107 E.R. 541, it was held to be a good defence to an action for malicious arrest that the defendant, when he caused the plaintiff to be arrested, acted bona fide upon the opinion of a legal adviser of competent skill and ability, and believed that he had a good cause of action against the plaintiff.

Other Questions


In a personal injury action, is there any case law where a defendant admitted the allegations in the statement of claim and submitted to the relief claimed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the Hedley Byrne principle apply to a claim where the claim is based on expert testimony? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the defences set up in the statement of defence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to sustain a claim of suicide in a life insurance claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is it appropriate for the defence to amend its defence to counterclaim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a claim to be successful in an insurance claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for claiming unjust enrichment in the context of a claim made by Alice against her former partner in her name? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a landlord who claims to be a tenant be able to claim as landlord of a property where the landlord is not the landlord of the tenant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a private person who makes an arrest justify doing so by showing that he had reasonable grounds to believe the arrest had been committed? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What grounds are set out in the statement of claim in support of a claim for the allowance of interest? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.