What are compelling reasons to allow the petitioner only party/party costs for this assessment?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Bridgewater Financial Services Ltd. v 347451 B.C. Ltd. et al, 2004 BCSC 21 (CanLII):
These findings together with the nearly 50% reduction of the petitioner’s claim could be “compelling reasons” to allow the petitioner only party/party costs for this assessment: Rampling v. Nootebos et al, supra, at para 60.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In assessing the reasonableness of a registrar's assessment, how has the registrar conducted her assessment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is 25 cents per page reasonable on party/party assessments for special costs assessments? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a judge have to assess costs summarily rather than having the costs assessed by the registrar? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a strata corporation commence an action to recover an unpaid assessment if the owner of the unit is assessed first and only if the assessment is unpaid? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can uplift costs be allowed after the scale of the cost is fixed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is security for costs of an appeal cost more readily than security for trial costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a registrar assess the reasonableness of s. 133 costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is reasonable conduct in litigation reasonable enough to warrant a reduction in costs? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons for assessing party/party costs in a notice of discontinuance? (British Columbia, Canada)
How to read the reasons of the adjudicator as a whole to assess whether the decision was reasonable? (British Columbia, Canada)
