As for punitive damages, Vorvis v. ICBC, 1989 CanLII 93 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1085 is still the leading authority. Punitive damages are divorced from the concept of compensation. Canadian law reserves an award of punitive damages for clear cases that demand punishment of the defendant. That Canadian law does so is obviously based on an understanding that once let slip punitive damages are inherently set and controlled by no inherent logic. It is my conclusion that there is nothing in the case at bar that engages the concept of punitive damages.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.