What is the test for open, public and accountable process?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Mr. C obo Ms. A v. The Company and another, 2011 BCHRT 96 (CanLII):
While there is an acknowledged public interest in an open, public and accountable process, exceptions are possible when that public interest is outweighed. See CH v. X and another, 2009 BCHRT 397.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a public statute, empowering public actors to accomplish public goals, alone give rise to a private duty between those public actors and a particular member of the public? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the fact that some funds may have been transferred to the joint account of a joint account with a different bank account make up for the failure to plead or lead evidence on false statement and inducement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a claim of misfeasance in public office be made out against one public official? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the police fail to warn the public about an open culvert? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a transferor intended to transfer funds from a bank account to a personal trust account at the time of the transfer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for survivorship when a joint account holder challenges a gratuitous transfer to the joint account? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a cold storage facility a "public service" for the public? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts found that the public hearing process in the Pitt Polder and Eddington cases was deficient? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a public by-law or statute authorizing the fluoridation of public water violate an individual's s .7 rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
When determining responsibility for the publication of an opinion by the editor of a news website, does the trier of fact have to consider the whole publication as a whole? (British Columbia, Canada)
