What is the standard of review of a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer?

Canada (Federal), Canada

The following excerpt is from Narany v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2008 FC 155 (CanLII):

In Figurado v. Canada (Solicitor General), 2005 FC 347, Justice Luc J. Martineau noted that the standard of review of a PRRA Officer’s decision, considered as a whole, is reasonableness, while particular factual findings should stand unless they are patently unreasonable. IV. Analysis A. Did the PRRA Officer err in not considering all of the evidence including the one presented at the first PRRA hearing?

Other Questions


When a hearing officer disagrees with a decision made by the reviewing officer on the issues with which he disagreed with the hearing officer, how will the review officer's decision be considered? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a decision by a Public Prosecutions Officer (PRRA) not to be reviewed because it is considered "globally and as a whole"? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Reviewable on the standard of reasonableness of a Public Prosecutions Reviewable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review for a decision under the Public Prosecutions Reform Act? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the standard of review applicable in a judicial review of a visa officer's decision? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a decision of the Public Prosecutions Officer reviewable? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a decision maker such as the Immigration Officer on an application for permanent residents in Canada be reviewed on a higher standard of review of patent unreasonableness? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Can a hearing officer, parole officer, hearing officer and parole official be immunized from prosecution? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the standard of review applicable to a judicial review of a decision of an adjudicator appointed pursuant to the Canada Labour Code? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What is the applicable standard of review for an officer to determine whether or not they err by giving more weight to a statement by the Canadian migratory integrity officer in Port-au-Prince than the other documents submitted in evidence? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.