Is a statement of both fact and opinion privileged?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Robinson v. Furlong, 2015 BCSC 1690 (CanLII):

Statements of both fact and opinion may attract the defence of privilege, depending on the occasion on which they were made. Some occasions, such as legal proceedings, are absolutely privileged. Others, such as reference letters, “enjoy ‘qualified’ privilege, meaning that the privilege can be defeated by proof that the defendant acted with malice”: Grant v. Torstar, 2009 SCC 61 at para. 30 [Torstar].

Other Questions


Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an independent statement privileged in the context of solicitor-and-client privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there an occasion of qualified privilege where a statement was given to a person who had an interest or duty to make the statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of qualified privilege against defamatory statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of qualified privilege against defamatory statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for an opinion or opinion comment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law supporting the generality of a statement of counsel's opinion? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury case, is it possible for counsel to provide a more detailed description of privileged material without disclosing privileged material? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does absolute privilege apply to statements made by a lawyer in the course of representing a client? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is litigation privilege and what is the argument that litigation privilege means? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.