Does the distinction between nuisance and trespass matter matter?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Allison v. Radtke, 2014 BCSC 1832 (CanLII):

The jurisprudence which discusses the distinction between nuisance and trespass is instructive with respect to the validity of the Plaintiffs’ trespass claim. In Plaunt v. Renfrew Power Generation Inc., 2011 ONSC 4087, R. Smith J. reviewed this jurisprudence, a portion of which is particularly helpful:

Other Questions


When will a court apportion costs in a mixed issue family matter between maintenance and support matters and custody and property issues? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated nuisance claims in nuisance cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a nuisance and what is the test for liability for nuisance? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a parent be held liable for their children’s trespass and nuisance damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does nuisance constitute nuisance in a strata setting? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether or not a nuisance is a matter of fact? (British Columbia, Canada)
When the BCLRC recommended that the distinction between express and constructive trusts be abolished for limitation purposes, does the distinction take into account the remedial constructive trust? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any need to amend or amend the pleadings of defendants in nuisance or trespass cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the causes of action for trespass, nuisance and violation of the rule in Rylands v Fletcher v Fletcher? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is private nuisance and what is the test for nuisance? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.