Does the Pizza Pizza decision represent the prevailing authority on the question?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Montpellier v. Montpellier, 2003 CanLII 38289 (ON SC):
The Pizza Pizza decision represents the prevailing authority on the question and has been cited with approval a number of times[3], notwithstanding the contrary view in Woodslee Credit Union v. Taylor[4] which does not appear to represent the correct view of the law on the question.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the court have any authority or authority to make health decisions about future vaccines? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the distinction between questions of law, questions of fact and questions of mixed law and fact? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to oppose a contract? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a disciplinary authority over a member of the House of Representatives an exercise of parliamentary privilege? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Chancellor of the Exchequer have any authority or authority to hold defendants liable for damages caused by a water main failure? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a duty of procedural fairness on every public authority making an administrative decision which is not of a legislative nature? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of the Court of Appeal’s decision not to bar a lawyer from representing a client in a personal injury matter? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or deference to a motion judge's decision to vary a custody order? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the Court of Appeal have any authority or authority to grant a motion for non-suit? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the standard of review of questions of law and questions of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
