In Picco v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2015 BCSC 1904, a case relied on by the plaintiff, Brown J. considered it appropriate to “augment” the plaintiff’s general damages based on the plaintiff’s acquired heroin addiction following the accident in question. In that case, the plaintiff had struggled with addiction issues prior to his accident. There was also extensive expert evidence at trial. One aspect of that evidence, which Brown J. found “instructive”, was that the plaintiff was more vulnerable and more susceptible to the use of narcotics than other members of the public.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.