What is a physician's duty to diagnose?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Miller v. Budzinski et al, 2004 BCSC 1730 (CanLII):

Physicians have a duty to diagnose. They are bound to exercise the degree of care and skill which could reasonably be expected of an average prudent practitioner of the same experience and standing (Gibbons v. Harris, supra).

Other Questions


What is the standard of care owed by a physician to a patient? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a physician or medical doctor required to testify to the medical necessity of a future care item? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of a future care costs award for a plaintiff who has been diagnosed with osteoarthritis? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a physician need to endorse all the items in a claim for future care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of care required by an ordinary and competent physician? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law that supports the argument that a radiologist will inevitably conclude that a fracture is present, based on the x-ray, and that the radiologist’s opinion is that the fracture should not have been diagnosed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is it necessary for a plaintiff to advance a future cost of care claim, in a medical malpractice action, to have a physician testify to the medical necessity of each and every item of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for cancelling arrears of child support for a spouse who has been diagnosed with a disability? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for having a physician testify to the medical necessity of each item claimed? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for accommodation to the point of undue hardship for an employee who has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.