The defendant appears to concede that the proceeds are a family asset. As he notes in his written submissions, personal injury awards are generally not considered to be family assets since they represent compensation for pain, suffering, loss of amenities of life and future care, all of which are personal to the injured person (Drean v. Drean, [1997] B.C.J. No. 737 (S.C.)). They may change their character over time, however, and if used for family purposes, may properly be characterized as family assets (Witges v. Witges, [1998] B.C.J. No. 3130 (S.C.)). I find that the proceeds do constitute a family asset. The more challenging issue is reapportionment.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.