How has Perrel J. OJ No. 178 considered whether a defendant has consented to having the action set down for trial?
Ontario, Canada
The following excerpt is from Lue v TD Bank Financial Group, 2015 ONSC 6288 (CanLII):
Six year later, Perrel J. again considered the issue in Vadivelu v. Sundaram, [2015] OJ No. 178, where he found that the defendant had consented to having the action set down for trial. As a result, he agreed that leave was needed and he went on to consider whether it should be granted. He did not, however, indicate how the defendant manifested his consent.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How has the Court of Appeal in B.C considered trial counsel’s performance on the basis that the performance of the trial counsel did not undermine confidence in the verdict? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors are considered to determine whether to bring a class action? (Ontario, Canada)
How has the trial judge considered the totality of evidence at trial for impaired driving? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the implications of a motion judge's decisions regarding the restoration of an action to the trial list under r.48.11 and the dismissal of an Action for Delay pursuant to r.24.01? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors must be considered when deciding whether to transfer a defendant to a different court? (Ontario, Canada)
In what circumstances will implied consent be considered to be implied consent? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors are considered in determining the appropriate forum for the trial of the action? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors will the court consider in determining whether to consolidate two separate actions at the same time? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors are considered by the Court in deciding whether to allow a plaintiff to sue for damages in a separate action against a landlord? (Ontario, Canada)
What factors must a court consider in determining whether to grant relief to a defendant who has defaulted on a loan? (Ontario, Canada)
